Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
History of Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mccrae, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘A violent thunderstorm’: Cardiazol treatment in British mental hospitals

Niall Mccrae

Box P026, Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK. n.mccrae{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk

In the annals of psychiatric treatment, the advent of Cardiazol therapy has been afforded merely passing mention as a stepping-stone to the development of electroconvulsive therapy. Yet in the 1930s it was the most widely used of the major somatic treatment innovations in Britain's public mental hospitals, where its relative simplicity and safety gave it preference over the elaborate and hazardous insulin coma procedure. Devised on a dubious hypothesis of biological antagonism, Cardiazol armed psychiatry with an immediately effective weapon in the battle against schizophrenia, an enduring and debilitating condition responsible for over half of the mental hospital population. What made Cardiazol work – or appear to work? This account shows how evaluation of convulsive therapy was skewed by naÔve outcome measurement and diagnostic discrepancies, and how its therapeutic indication evolved from schizophrenia to affective disorders. Psychological mechanisms are considered, with the suggestion that the intense fear experienced during treatment – the major reason for abandoning Cardiazol in favour of electroshock – was therapeutically advantageous.

Key Words: Britain • Cardiazol treatment • convulsive therapy • electroshock • history • Isabel Wilson • Ladislaus von Meduna • Manfred Sakel • physical treatments • psychiatry

History of Psychiatry, Vol. 17, No. 1, 67-90 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0957154X06061723


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
G. Gazdag, I. Bitter, G. S. Ungvari, and B. Baran
Convulsive therapy turns 75
The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2009; 194(5): 387 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soc Hist MedHome page
E. Jones and S. Rahman
Framing Mental Illness, 1923-1939: The Maudsley Hospital and its Patients
Soc Hist Med, April 1, 2008; 21(1): 107 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]